Yes !

When the cancer is advanced , the natural inclination of doctors and patients is chose immediate therapy .

This is the logical and correct thing to do in many cancer patients.

But there are exceptions!

For example, it is well known that some advanced kidney cancer patients can be managed by “active surveillance” or “wait and watch policy” ONLY without any immediate cancer treatment.

A study presented at a Cancer meeting in Chicago confirms that this approach is safe and feasible in “carefully selected” patients.

The study patients who were managed by “active surveillance” or “wait and watch policy” ONLY had preservation of quality of life compared to patients on cancer treatments.

This approach is reassuring but this approach is not for everyone; the study is about kidney cancer patients only. Not other cancers. Patients do need to make an informed choice after discussing the option with their oncologists.

The study data was presented at the prestigious annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) at Chicago.

Dr Sundar is a member of American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and has been a member for more than 25 years.

References

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2025. Real-world quality of life (QOL) in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) on active surveillance (AS) in the ODYSSEY prospective observational study. Publication: Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Disclaimer: Please note – This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is NOT a expert medical opinion on various topics. This blog is purely for information research only and do check the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options, which are relevant and specific to you. The views expressed in this blog are NOT, in any way whatsoever, intended to be a substitute for professional advice. The blog is NOT previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed, in any way, by any organisation that the author is associated with. The views expressed in this blog likely represents some of the author’s personal views held at the time of drafting the blog and MAY CHANGE overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light.