Tag: Wait and Watch

Can some advanced kidney cancer patients be managed by wait and watch only ?

Yes !

When the cancer is advanced , the natural inclination of doctors and patients is chose immediate therapy .

This is the logical and correct thing to do in many cancer patients.

But there are exceptions!

For example, it is well known that some advanced kidney cancer patients can be managed by “active surveillance” or “wait and watch policy” ONLY without any immediate cancer treatment.

A study presented at a Cancer meeting in Chicago confirms that this approach is safe and feasible in “carefully selected” patients.

The study patients who were managed by “active surveillance” or “wait and watch policy” ONLY had preservation of quality of life compared to patients on cancer treatments.

This approach is reassuring but this approach is not for everyone; the study is about kidney cancer patients only. Not other cancers. Patients do need to make an informed choice after discussing the option with their oncologists.

The study data was presented at the prestigious annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) at Chicago.

Dr Sundar is a member of American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and has been a member for more than 25 years.

References

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2025. Real-world quality of life (QOL) in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) on active surveillance (AS) in the ODYSSEY prospective observational study. Publication: Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Disclaimer: Please note – This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is NOT a expert medical opinion on various topics. This blog is purely for information research only and do check the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options, which are relevant and specific to you. The views expressed in this blog are NOT, in any way whatsoever, intended to be a substitute for professional advice. The blog is NOT previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed, in any way, by any organisation that the author is associated with. The views expressed in this blog likely represents some of the author’s personal views held at the time of drafting the blog and MAY CHANGE overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light.

Prostate cancer : Surgery versus Radiotherapy

The question of whether to chose surgery or radiotherapy is a difficult decision for most patients with early prostate cancer.

Adding to this confusion is the option of wait and watch policy followed by delayed treatment (if needed) as supported by PROTECT trial.

A high quality UK trial called PACE-A compared surgery versus Radiation in men with low- to intermediate-risk localised prostate cancer.

At 2 years , the study found more people in surgery group reported using more urinary pads and also more sexual problems than radiotherapy group. But the surgery group reported fewer bowel problems than radiotherapy group.

At present, efficacy is expected to be equivalent between two modalities and long term results in term of efficacy is eagerly awaited

Further more, long term data needed in terms of toxicity . This is because some surgery related side effects tend to remain stable whereas some radiotherapy side effects can increase over time. Particularly relevant is the risk of radiation induced cancers can increase over time time . This would be relevant for slightly younger people (eg 60s) who have longer life expectancy compared to elderly people ( eg 80s) .

Also radiation could be used as salvage therapy ( kept as reserve just in case if cancer comes back after surgery ). Whereas if radiation is given upfront, then surgery as second option is usually not a viable option. The caveat is the most intermediate risk cancer patients do not have a relapse after 1st line therapy.

Reference

European Urology Journal: Radical Prostatectomy Versus Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Clinically Localised Prostate Cancer: Results of the PACE-A Randomised Trial.

NEJM Protect trial . Fifteen-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.

Disclaimer: Please note – This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is NOT a expert medical opinion on various topics. This blog is purely for information only and do check the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options relevant to you. The views expressed in this blog are NOT, in any way whatsoever, intended to be a substitute for professional advice. The blog is NOT previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed, in any way, by any organisation that the author is associated with. The views expressed in this blog likely represents some of the author’s personal views held at the time of drafting the blog and MAY CHANGE overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light.

Can some very early bladder cancer patients avoid BCG treatment?

Yes

Recent Japanese trial data suggests that selected patients can be managed by “wait and watch” policy alone .

Reference

1. Trial design: JCOG1019: An Open-label, Non-inferiority, Randomised Phase 3 Study Comparing the Effectiveness of Watchful Waiting (WW) and Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in Patients (Pts) with High-grade pT1 (HGT1) Bladder Cancer with pT0 on the 2nd Transurethral Resection (TUR) Specimen

Disclaimer: Please note – This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is NOT a expert medical opinion on various topics. This blog is purely for information only and do check the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options relevant to you. The views expressed in this blog are NOT, in any way whatsoever, intended to be a substitute for professional advice. The blog is NOT previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed, in any way, by any organisation that the author is associated with. The views expressed in this blog likely represents some of the author’s personal views held at the time of drafting the blog and MAY CHANGE overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light.

Is it safe to delay treatment in low risk prostate cancer?

Low risk prostate cancers are sometimes managed by a “wait and watch” approach and frequent monitoring rather than immediate prostate surgery.

Is this approach safe? Yes

A recent report after 10 year follow-up , from a Canadian trial shows that this approach can be safely done with an active monitoring protocol.

In this study, 10 years after diagnosis, half the men were fine without any worsening of their prostate cancer. Reassuringly only less than 2% developed metastatic disease, and less than 1% died of their disease.

These results confirm that “active surveillance” can be an effective management strategy for patients diagnosed with favorable-risk prostate cancer.

References

Long-Term Outcomes in Patients Using Protocol-Directed Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
JAMA. Published online May 3, 2024

Disclaimer: Please note – This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is NOT a expert medical opinion on various topics. This blog is purely for information only and do check the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options relevant to you. The views expressed in this blog are NOT, in any way whatsoever, intended to be a substitute for professional advice. The blog is NOT previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed, in any way, by any organisation that the author is associated with. The views expressed in this blog likely represents some of the author’s personal views held at the time of drafting the blog and MAY CHANGE overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light.