Category: Advanced Cancer

How to make prostate cancer patients better tolerate chemotherapy ?

In patients with incurable & widespread prostate cancer, one of the treatment option is a combination of three treatments (“TRIPLET THERAPY”)

This TRIPLET combination involves CHEMOTHERAPY given with HORMONE INJECTIONS and HORMONE TABLETS.

But many prostate cancer patients are frail and elderly with multiple other medical problems. So chemotherapy is not used in those patients and only Hormone tablets and injections are used .

The DOUBLET combination of HORMONE INJECTIONS and HORMONE TABLETS do a good very job indeed and frail patients are spared the nasty side effects from chemotherapy.

A study presented at the annual congress of European Society for Medical Oncology at BERLIN shows that if chemotherapy at a lower dose and is given every 2 weeks rather the typical every 3 weeks , then chemotherapy is better tolerated. The 2 weekly schedule resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful reduction in the incidence of severe side effects.

References

  1. ARASAFE : ESMO daily reporter. Is less more for patients with genitourinary cancers? 17 Oct 2025 Christoph Oing
  2. ESMO . LBA92 – 3-weekly docetaxel 75 mg/m2 vs 2-weekly docetaxel 50 mg/m2 in combination with darolutamide + ADT in patients with mHSPC: Results from the randomised phase III ARASAFE trial

Disclaimer: Please note – This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is NOT a expert medical opinion on various topics. This blog is purely for information research only and do check the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options, which are relevant and specific to you. The views expressed in this blog are NOT, in any way whatsoever, intended to be a substitute for professional advice. The blog is NOT previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed, in any way, by any organisation that the author is associated with. The views expressed in this blog likely represents some of the author’s personal views held at the time of drafting the blog and MAY CHANGE overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light.

Bladder cancer: Are 3 cycles of chemotherapy as good as 6 cycles – when combined with immunotherapy maintenance?

Yes; 3 is as good as 6.

The annual congress of European Society for Medical Oncology is currently underway at Berlin. Lot of exciting studies are being presented.

One of the interesting studies relate to bladder cancer. The bladder study looked at the optimum number of chemotherapy cycles that needs to be given.

Chemotherapy do cause significantly more side effects the immunotherapy. If fewer cycles are given, treatment might be more tolerable.

This bladder trial looked at giving only 3 cycles of chemotherapy compared to the standard 6 cycles.

The study found that fewer cycles improved quality of life without compromising overall benefits from the treatment

Reference

Grande E, et al. DISCUS: A phase II study comparing 3 vs 6 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy prior to maintenance avelumab in advanced urothelial cancer. ESMO Congress 2025 – LBA 109

ESMO daily reporter. Is less more for patients with genitourinary cancers? 17 Oct 2025 Christoph Oing

Disclaimer: Please note – This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is NOT a expert medical opinion on various topics. This blog is purely for information research only and do check the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options, which are relevant and specific to you. The views expressed in this blog are NOT, in any way whatsoever, intended to be a substitute for professional advice. The blog is NOT previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed, in any way, by any organisation that the author is associated with. The views expressed in this blog likely represents some of the author’s personal views held at the time of drafting the blog and MAY CHANGE overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light.

Is radiotherapy to prostate useful even after the cancer has escaped from prostate?

Yes, it can be helpful but only in certain circumstances.

Former US President Biden is in the news this week and multiple media outlets reports that Biden is having  radiation therapy to prostate along with hormone therapy.

The news outlets also indicate that Biden has aggressive prostate cancer which has spread to the bones.

Any spread of prostate cancer to bones is classified as stage 4 prostate cancer.

If cancer has NOT spread outside the prostate, the combination of radiation and hormones could be curative .

But, with stage 4 prostate cancer, radiation is generally not curative. This is because once the cancer cells have spread, it is extremely difficult to eradicate those cancer cells permanently. 

A large UK trial ( STAMPEDE trials) found that “Radiotherapy to the prostate did NOT improve overall survival for unselected patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer”

So if radiation does not improve survival, why did the oncologists offer radiation therapy to Biden?

Full medical details are not available and so it is difficult to give a definitive answer in Biden’s case.

There are few possibilities.

In the above mentioned STAMPEDE trial , in a smaller select group of patients, Radiation therapy did improve overall survival in men with a low metastatic burden. ( ie fewer cells have spread).

One can only speculate whether that’s been the case with regards to Mr Biden.

References

  1. CNN. Biden starts radiation therapy for aggressive form of prostate cancer. By Kevin Liptak, Fadel Allassa. UPDATED OCT 11, 2025, 11:28 AM PUBLISHED OCT 11, 2025, 10:01 AM
  2. BBC news. Biden receiving radiation therapy for prostate cancer. By Jaroslav Lukiv. Published 11 October 2025.
  3. Lancet. Stampede trial. Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial.

Disclaimer: Please note – This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is NOT a expert medical opinion on various topics. This blog is purely for information research only and do check the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options, which are relevant and specific to you. The views expressed in this blog are NOT, in any way whatsoever, intended to be a substitute for professional advice. The blog is NOT previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed, in any way, by any organisation that the author is associated with. The views expressed in this blog likely represents some of the author’s personal views held at the time of drafting the blog and MAY CHANGE overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light.

Can Gerson therapy or alternative treatment cure cancer ?

No !

No one has published any reliable scientific evidence to prove alternative therapies such as Gerson therapy can cure cancer.

When some one is diagnosed with cancer, particularly at a young age, the shock is unimaginable!

People are so shocked they start to question everything.

People can be understandably very worried about side effects of conventional treatments such as chemotherapy.

People with cancer can be frightened about everything.

BUT alternative therapy is not the answer to their worries and concerns.

Alternative therapy has not been shown to cure cancer.

There are lot of scams on social media promoting so called alternative or complimentary therapy. Be careful!

Even worse are the misguided people who promote well-intentioned but dangerous unscientific information.

Any one who has been newly diagnosed with cancer should be aware of the enormous amount of misinformation out there.

Some complementary therapies (eg massage, aromatherapy ) can have palliative and psychological benefits but they do not cure or control the cancer.

The recent BBC news article about a young women, who died of a potentially curable cancer, should be a warning to other people.

References

BBC News. ‘Our sister died of cancer because of our mum’s conspiracy theories’. Published 23 June 2025. Marianna Spring. Social media investigations correspondent

Telegraph. Cambridge graduate ‘killed by mother’s anti-medicine conspiracy theories’. Gwyn Wright. 24 June 2025 6:21am BST

Disclaimer: Please note – This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is NOT a expert medical opinion on various topics. This blog is purely for information research only and do check the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options, which are relevant and specific to you. The views expressed in this blog are NOT, in any way whatsoever, intended to be a substitute for professional advice. The blog is NOT previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed, in any way, by any organisation that the author is associated with. The views expressed in this blog likely represents some of the author’s personal views held at the time of drafting the blog and MAY CHANGE overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light.

Can exercise make cancer patients live longer?

Yes, exercise can make cancer patients live longer.

A recent study of bowel cancer patients showed that people who had a “structured exercise program” had better fitness and a longer life.

The study data was presented at the prestigious annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) at Chicago.

Dr Sundar is a member of American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and has been a member for more than 25 years.

References

  1. ASCO abstract. A randomized phase III trial of the impact of a structured exercise program on disease-free survival (DFS) in stage 3 or high-risk stage 2 colon cancer: Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG) CO.21 (CHALLENGE).
  2. CNN news. Exercise may help patients with colon cancer live as long as those who never had it, study suggests
    By Madeline Holcombe, CNN
     4 minute read
    Published 3:02 PM EST, Mon February 24, 2025
  3. CNN. New research presents promising findings on colorectal cancer treatment and prevention
  4. BBC news. Major study shows exercise improves cancer survival.

Disclaimer: Please note – This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is NOT a expert medical opinion on various topics. This blog is purely for information research only and do check the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options, which are relevant and specific to you. The views expressed in this blog are NOT, in any way whatsoever, intended to be a substitute for professional advice. The blog is NOT previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed, in any way, by any organisation that the author is associated with. The views expressed in this blog likely represents some of the author’s personal views held at the time of drafting the blog and MAY CHANGE overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light.

New drug for platinum resistant ovarian cancer

Multiple new drugs have been developed lung and breast cancers over the last decade.

But only a few new drugs have been approved for ovarian cancers in the past decade.

Drugs like Olaparib and Niraparib – which have been approved for ovarian cancers recently – are maintenance drugs used after chemotherapy rather than used as an upfront treatment .

So it is very good news that a brand new drug is likely to enter the market in the near future.

The new drug is called Relacorilant.(Rela).

It has been tested in ovarian cancers which have become resistant to the platinum drugs.

Platinum drugs are the standard of care ovarian cancers and most other drugs do not work very well once ovarian cancers have become resistant to carboplatin or cisplatin (platinum resistant ovarian cancers).

So it is very good news that we may have a new option now for this group of patients with platinum resistant ovarian cancers.

Early phase drug trial results of Rela in 2023 were promising but not definitive.

Advanced phase 3 trials of Rela have been positive in improving survival (2025).

The study results were due to presented at the prestigious annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) at Chicago.( June 2025).

Dr Sundar is a member of American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and has been a member for more than 25 years.

References

1. Relacorilant + Nab-Paclitaxel in Patients With Recurrent, Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer: A Three-Arm, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Phase II Study
Nicoletta Colombo et al. J Clin Oncol. 2023.

2. Targeted oncology. News Article. March 31, 2025. Relacorilant Extends Survival in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer Mar 31, 2025 . By Jordyn Sava. Fact checked by: Jason M. Broderick

3. ROSELLA: A phase 3 study of relacorilant in combination with nab-paclitaxel versus nab-paclitaxel monotherapy in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (GOG-3073, ENGOT-ov72).

Disclaimer: Please note – This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is NOT a expert medical opinion on various topics. This blog is purely for information research only and do check the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options, which are relevant and specific to you. The views expressed in this blog are NOT, in any way whatsoever, intended to be a substitute for professional advice. The blog is NOT previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed, in any way, by any organisation that the author is associated with. The views expressed in this blog likely represents some of the author’s personal views held at the time of drafting the blog and MAY CHANGE overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light.

Can applying some electric current make chemotherapy work better in pancreatic cancer ?

Yes !

Applying electricity to tumours can help to improve control of pancreatic cancer.

The procedure is called TTfFields.

The procedure is not invasive.

The procedure uses low-energy electricity which impedes cancer cells’ ability to grow and divide.

The procedure is done alongside standard chemotherapy .

The TTFields electric treatments has already been tested and has shown promise in brain tumours and lung cancers.

A study presented at the Chicago ASCO meeting shows better survival in patients who had TTFields electricity in addition to their usual chemotherapy regimen of gemcitabine and abraxane (nab-paclitaxel) for pancreatic cancer.

The study data was presented at the prestigious annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) at Chicago.

Dr Sundar is a member of American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and has been a member for more than 25 years.

References

  1. Tumour treating fields therapy for glioblastoma: current advances and future directions. British Journal of Cancer volume 124, pages 697–709 (2021)
  2. Weinberg U, Farber O, Giladi M, Bomzon Z, Kirson ED. Tumor treating field concurrent with standard of care for stage 4 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following platinum failure: Phase III LUNAR study. [abstract]. ESMO, October 2018. Ann Oncol. 2018;29:viii543. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy292.120.
  3. Lancet oncology. Tumor Treating Fields therapy with standard systemic therapy versus standard systemic therapy alone in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer following progression on or after platinum-based therapy (LUNAR): a randomised, open-label, pivotal phase 3 study.
  4. Wiki. Alternating electric field therapy.
  5. PANOVA-3: Phase 3 study of tumor treating fields (TTFields) with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel for locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (LA-PAC) .

Disclaimer: Please note – This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is NOT a expert medical opinion on various topics. This blog is purely for information research only and do check the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options, which are relevant and specific to you. The views expressed in this blog are NOT, in any way whatsoever, intended to be a substitute for professional advice. The blog is NOT previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed, in any way, by any organisation that the author is associated with. The views expressed in this blog likely represents some of the author’s personal views held at the time of drafting the blog and MAY CHANGE overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light.

Can some advanced kidney cancer patients be managed by wait and watch only ?

Yes !

When the cancer is advanced , the natural inclination of doctors and patients is chose immediate therapy .

This is the logical and correct thing to do in many cancer patients.

But there are exceptions!

For example, it is well known that some advanced kidney cancer patients can be managed by “active surveillance” or “wait and watch policy” ONLY without any immediate cancer treatment.

A study presented at a Cancer meeting in Chicago confirms that this approach is safe and feasible in “carefully selected” patients.

The study patients who were managed by “active surveillance” or “wait and watch policy” ONLY had preservation of quality of life compared to patients on cancer treatments.

This approach is reassuring but this approach is not for everyone; the study is about kidney cancer patients only. Not other cancers. Patients do need to make an informed choice after discussing the option with their oncologists.

The study data was presented at the prestigious annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) at Chicago.

Dr Sundar is a member of American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and has been a member for more than 25 years.

References

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2025. Real-world quality of life (QOL) in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) on active surveillance (AS) in the ODYSSEY prospective observational study. Publication: Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Disclaimer: Please note – This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is NOT a expert medical opinion on various topics. This blog is purely for information research only and do check the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options, which are relevant and specific to you. The views expressed in this blog are NOT, in any way whatsoever, intended to be a substitute for professional advice. The blog is NOT previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed, in any way, by any organisation that the author is associated with. The views expressed in this blog likely represents some of the author’s personal views held at the time of drafting the blog and MAY CHANGE overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light.

More pancreatic cancer patients may benefit from immunotherapy

Immunotherapy has revolutionised cancer treatment over the last few years . But, sadly, not all cancer patients derive benefit from the costly immunotherapy drugs. 

For instance, almost, all advanced kidney or skin melanoma cancer patients are eligible to try immunotherapy. But only about 1% of patients with pancreatic cancer are at present eligible for immunotherapy .

A new study suggests more people with pancreatic cancer may be eligible for immunotherapy. 

The preliminary data from a good quality early study (randomized phase II trial) is interesting.

The study compared treatment with gemcitabine (G) and nab-paclitaxel (N) with and without dual immunotherapy treatment with durvalumab (D) and tremelimumab (T) as 1st-line therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. 

In this study, only a subset of patients derived benefit from the dual combination therapy. 

Subsequent molecular and genetic analysis showed that the presence of certain gene mutations (≥2 DDR) was strongly associated with benefit from the combination of chemotherapy with dual immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. 

These intriguing exploratory data analysis needs confirmatory data before the combination therapy become the standard of care for advanced pancreatic cancer patients.

The study data was presented at the prestigious annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) hosted at Chicago.

Dr Sundar is a member of American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and has been a member for more than 25 years.

References

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2025: Concurrent mutations in DNA damage repair genes BRCA1, POLE, ATM and FANCA to predict overall and progression-free survival for patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) treated with chemotherapy in combination with dual checkpoint inhibition in the CCTG randomized PA.7 trial.

Evaluating Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Challenges and Recommendations. Clin Cancer Res (2018) 24 (6): 1326–1336.

Disclaimer: Please note – This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is NOT a expert medical opinion on various topics. This blog is purely for information research only and do check the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options, which are relevant and specific to you. The views expressed in this blog are NOT, in any way whatsoever, intended to be a substitute for professional advice. The blog is NOT previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed, in any way, by any organisation that the author is associated with. The views expressed in this blog likely represents some of the author’s personal views held at the time of drafting the blog and MAY CHANGE overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light.

How long can a man with aggressive prostate cancer live?

Many people were shocked by the news that president Joe Biden, aged 82, has been diagnosed with aggressive prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer is quite common in men in their eighties. Nearly two third of men in eighties would have prostate cancer and most of these men do not die of prostate cancer! This is because lot of the cancers in elderly men are low to medium risk.

But men who develop aggressive prostate cancer are at higher risk of death from prostate cancer. Aggressive prostate cancer can spread to bone and other organs.

It has to be pointed out that aggressive prostate cancer is not immediately terminal in vast majority of men, even if the cancer has spread to bone.

With modern hormone treatments, men can have a prognosis of many years.

References

  1. BBC. Joe Biden diagnosed with ‘aggressive’ prostate cancer
  2. CRUK. Prostate Cancer incidence statistics .
  3. CRUK. Prostate cancer survival statistics.
  4. NEJM. Apalutamide for Metastatic, Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.
  5. Lancet. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone with or without enzalutamide for patients with metastatic prostate cancer starting androgen deprivation therapy: final results from two randomised phase 3 trials of the STAMPEDE platform protocol.

Disclaimer: Please note – This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is NOT a expert medical opinion on various topics. This blog is purely for information research only and do check the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options, which are relevant and specific to you. The views expressed in this blog are NOT, in any way whatsoever, intended to be a substitute for professional advice. The blog is NOT previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed, in any way, by any organisation that the author is associated with. The views expressed in this blog likely represents some of the author’s personal views held at the time of drafting the blog and MAY CHANGE overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light.

How common is prostate cancer in men under 50?

Sir Chris Hoy, who is six-time Olympic cycling champion stunned the British public recently by revealing that that he has stage 4 incurable prostate cancer.

It was even more shocking because of his young age. He is only 48 years old !

Naturally, many men under 50 yrs would be concerned.

According to CRUK statistics “1 in 6 men in UK will be diagnosed with prostate cancer”.

But majority of cancers occur in men 60 yrs and above. The peak age for prostate cancer is in the 75-79 age range. Prostate cancer is very uncommon before age of 50.

So in most men, screening for prostate cancer is not recommended before the age of 50.

There are some exceptions to this age limit of 50. For example, men with black ethnicity or those with a family history of prostate cancer are at a higher risk. These men can consider requesting a PSA test in their mid 40s.

Please note prostate cancer screening does NOT result in better lives for everyone. Screening has its benefits but it also has drawbacks .

A cancer diagnosis is terrifying but it is important to note that NOT Everyman with prostate cancer will die due to prostate cancer. Lot of men with early prostate cancer will die of something else. Moreover, treatment for early prostate cancer has significant side effects.

That is why every man is NOT routinely and automatically offered screening by their GP surgery in UK.

Even though routine PSA testing is not offered on the NHS, as mentioned in the NHS website “Men aged 50 or over can ask their GP for a PSA test, even if they do not have symptoms”. 

References

1. BBC news. Prostate cancer symptoms and treatment: What to check for.

2. BBC news. NHS to review prostate cancer testing after Chris Hoy call for change

3. NEJM. Fifteen-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

Disclaimer: Please note – This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is NOT a expert medical opinion on various topics. This blog is purely for information only and do check the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options relevant to you. The views expressed in this blog are NOT, in any way whatsoever, intended to be a substitute for professional advice. The blog is NOT previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed, in any way, by any organisation that the author is associated with. The views expressed in this blog likely represents some of the author’s personal views held at the time of drafting the blog and MAY CHANGE overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light.

New treatment option for advanced prostate cancer patients

Advanced prostate patients were treated with hormone injections only in the past. When these advanced cancer patients were no longer responding to those hormone injections, tablets such as Enzalutamide , Apalutamide and Abiraterone were added to the hormone injections.

A new combination has become available for use in these patients.

Data presented at the ESMO Congress 2024 (Barcelona, 13–17 September) demonstrated the potential of combining Enzalutamide and Radium 223 injections.

The combination Enzalutamide and Radium 223 injections was better than Enzalutamide tablets alone.

The combination is likely to become a standard of care for these patients.

The only caveat is that a lot of advanced cancer patients are nowadays treated with hormone injections and tablets upfront. This trial data does not directly apply to these patients.

Disclaimer: Please note – This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is NOT a expert medical opinion on various topics. This blog is purely for information only and do check the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options relevant to you. The views expressed in this blog are NOT, in any way whatsoever, intended to be a substitute for professional advice. The blog is NOT previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed, in any way, by any organisation that the author is associated with. The views expressed in this blog likely represents some of the author’s personal views held at the time of drafting the blog and MAY CHANGE overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light.

ESMO update on Thymus tumours

Tumours of Thymus are rare. So clinical data is usually spare. Hence they do not feature prominently in International conferences.

So it is interesting and a welcome gesture that ESMO dedicated a morning session to Thymic tumours. (ESMO European Society of Medical Oncology Congress-2024, Fira Barcelona).

Understandably, in a conference hall meant for thousands of delegates only a few hundreds turned up for the rare thymic tumours ( as delegates attended the 12 other massive halls with simultaneous sessions for common cancers such as prostate, breast , bowel etc).

The relevant updates from this session are: 

  1. Surgical resection where feasible is the best treatment.
  2. in selected cases , post-operative radiotherapy can be considered 
  3. Routine adjuvant chemotherapy after complete surgical excision for early cancers is NOT indicated 
  4. Thymic cancers are chemo-sensitive and they have the potential to turn inoperable cancers to operable cancers.
  5. Platinum and Anthracycline combination chemo regimens have the best response rates.
  6. Immunotherapy and Molecular targeted therapy are possible options in those resistant to platinum drugs in addition to other non-platinum chemotherapy drugs .

Disclaimer: Please note – This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is NOT a expert medical opinion on various topics. This blog is purely for information only and do check the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options relevant to you. The views expressed in this blog are NOT, in any way whatsoever, intended to be a substitute for professional advice. The blog is NOT previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed, in any way, by any organisation that the author is associated with. The views expressed in this blog likely represents some of the author’s personal views held at the time of drafting the blog and MAY CHANGE overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light.

New drug for and 2nd and 3rd line treatment of Kidney cancer

Advanced Kidney cancer can be kept under control for long periods with current treatments.

Combination of immunotherapy and agents targeting VEGF are commonly used in 1st line treatment of advanced Kidney cancers.

For those patients who cancers stop responding to these above treatments, there is good news.

A new agent targeting cancers in a different way has become available recently and updated results are very encouraging.

This new drug called Belzutifan targets a different weak spot in the cancer. Belzutifan has shown better cancer control rates when compared to another drug called Everolimus.

Belzutifan results are being presented at ESMO congress in Barcelona

Belzutifan will become a standard of care in this setting now

Reference

ESMO news. Belzutifan Shows a Significant Benefit Over Everolimus in Patients with Advanced Clear Cell RCC After Both ICI and Antiangiogenic Therapies

NEJM Belzutifan versus Everolimus for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma

Disclaimer: Please note – This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is NOT a expert medical opinion on various topics. This blog is purely for information only and do check the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options relevant to you. The views expressed in this blog are NOT, in any way whatsoever, intended to be a substitute for professional advice. The blog is NOT previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed, in any way, by any organisation that the author is associated with. The views expressed in this blog likely represents some of the author’s personal views held at the time of drafting the blog and MAY CHANGE overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light.

Milder chemotherapy for older patients with pancreatic cancer

Older adults with newly diagnosed advanced pancreatic cancer are often frail and vulnerable.

The standard chemotherapy regimens such as the FOLFIRINOX regimen are quite toxic and not suitable for frail patients.

At the recent ASCO meeting in Chicago, a study which utilised gentler versions of the existing chemotherapy regimens was presented.

These gentler versions were found to have reasonable efficacy and toxicity.

References

1. ASCO post. Efrat Dotan, MD, on Pancreatic Cancer in Older Adults: Defining the Optimal Treatment Approach.

2. ASCO 2024 Abstract. A randomized phase II study of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel compared with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and liposomal irinotecan in older patients with treatment-naïve metastatic pancreatic cancer (GIANT): ECOG-ACRIN EA2186.

Disclaimer: Please note – This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is NOT a expert medical opinion on various topics. This blog is purely for information only and do check the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options relevant to you. The views expressed in this blog are NOT, in any way whatsoever, intended to be a substitute for professional advice. The blog is NOT previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed, in any way, by any organisation that the author is associated with. The views expressed in this blog likely represents some of the author’s personal views held at the time of drafting the blog and MAY CHANGE overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light.

Why advanced cancer patients choose to have chemotherapy!

Many people would be surprised to learn that cancer patients with advanced incurable cancer actively choose chemotherapy for relatively small benefits.

Chemotherapy has the potential to relieve cancer related symptoms but in many advanced cancers, Chemotherapy prolongs survival ( on average ) only by a few months . Yet, lot of patients do opt to try chemotherapy which can be sometimes quite toxic.

Even in countries such as U.K. where oncologists are NOT on a fee for service contract (such as NHS), lot of patients do opt for Chemotherapy.

Perhaps, Chemotherapy gives hope for people not ready to face death.

Read my views in BMJ and contribute your thoughts on this topic through the rapid response section of online BMJ.

BMJ Article: Death, futility, and oncology

Free to access link: http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/bmj.o1785?ijkey=Du1yaSA5KhkGz23&keytype=ref

Disclaimer: Please note – This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is NOT a expert medical opinion on various topics. This blog is purely for information only and do check the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options relevant to you. The views expressed in this blog are NOT, in any way whatsoever, intended to be a substitute for professional advice. The blog is NOT previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed, in any way, by any organisation that the author is associated with. The views expressed in this blog likely represents some of the author’s personal views held at the time of drafting the blog and MAY CHANGE overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light.

Can vitamins increase risk of cancer ?

Yes

Vitamins are absolutely essential nutrients and vitamin deficiency causes various illness.

But a high dose of vitamin, far too much than needed by the body, is also bad.

Everything in moderation is good. Even an abundance of a good thing is bad.

It is similar to food. Lack of food would cause starvation and even death in the extreme. But too much of food causes obesity and other health problems. Same principle applies to vitamins.

A Cochrane review looked at the ability of vitamins to prevent lung cancer. The review concluded that there is “no beneficial effect of supplements for the prevention of lung cancer and lung cancer mortality in healthy people”

Worryingly, the review also found that the following:

– Vitamin A supplements increase lung cancer incidence and mortality in smokers or persons exposed to asbestos”.

– Vitamin C increases lung cancer incidence in women.

– Vitamin E increases the risk of haemorrhagic strokes.

So if you are having a healthy balanced diet, be careful with vitamin supplements.

Drugs for preventing lung cancer in healthy people
Marcela Cortés-Jofré et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020.
Free PMC article

Disclaimer: Please note- This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is NOT a expert medical opinion on various topics. This blog is purely for information only and do check the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options relevant to you. The views expressed in this blog represent the author’s views held at the time of drafting the blog and may change overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light. The blog is not previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed by any organisation that the author is associated with. The views expressed in this blog are not, in way whatsoever, intended to be a substitute for professional advice.

New treatment for Prostate cancer

At the recent ESMO congress, new data was presented showing that upfront treatment with Abiraterone helps patients liver longer.

Hormone injections plus Chemotherapy is standard of care for new diagnosed advanced prostate cancer ( doublet treatment).

A French trial ( PEACE 1) explored the use of Abiraterone in this setting. The investigators found that a “triplet treatment” of Abiraterone + Chemotherapy + Hormone injections would make people live substantially.

This is likely to become standard of care in near future.

Another U.K. trial ( STAMPEDE) assessed Abiraterone in the High risk but less advanced prostate cancer. The study found that adding Abiraterone to the other treatments can improve survival of prostate patients.

This again is likely to become standard of care.

References

Possible changes in the standard of care for metastatic and non-metastatic prostate cancer. 19 Sep 2021. ESMO Congress 2021

Disclaimer: Please note – This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is NOT a expert medical opinion on various topics. This blog is purely for information only and do check the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options relevant to you. The views expressed in this blog are NOT, in way whatsoever, intended to be a substitute for professional advice. The blog is NOT previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed, in any way, by any organisation that the author is associated with. The views expressed in this blog likely represents some of the author’s personal views held at the time of drafting the blog and MAY CHANGE overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light.

Immunotherapy improves survival of patients with Advanced Cervical cancer

Advanced Cervical cancer, that cannot be cured by surgery or radiotherpy, is usually treated with chemotherapy.

A study assessed the effectiveness of immunotherapy in combination with standard chemotherapy.

The results were presented at the ESMO (European Medical Oncology Conference) on 18th Sept 2021.

The combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy is remarkably better and makes patients live longer.

This is likely to become the standard of care now.

References

Presidential Symposium 1 (ESMO Congress 2021). KEYNOTE-826 trial met its dual primary endpoints.

Disclaimer: Please note – This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is NOT a expert medical opinion on various topics. This blog is purely for information only and do check the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options relevant to you. The views expressed in this blog are NOT, in way whatsoever, intended to be a substitute for professional advice. The blog is NOT previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed, in any way, by any organisation that the author is associated with. The views expressed in this blog likely represents some of the author’s personal views held at the time of drafting the blog and MAY CHANGE overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light.

A new blood test for cancer

Cancer cells can float in a person’s blood. But finding them, in the past, used to be like “looking for a needle in a haystack”.

But new smart technology promises to detect these cancer cells easily and much early before a person develops symptoms. Detection of cancer cells at an early stage may be helpful for some patients.

A recently published study in the journal “Annals of Oncology” reports exciting results.

A Californian company called Grail has developed a blood test which seems to have a high degree of accuracy for detection of multiple cancers.

Times newspaper reports that “The NHS will begin a pilot scheme of the test with 140,000 people this year. If that is successful it will be used for millions of patients by 2025”

A word of caution though.

Just because something could be diagnosed early does not always mean that it is a good thing.

The most important thing is whether the early diagnosis can lead to better cure rates and a better quality of life.

If a test detects a cancer early but has no meaningful effect on quantity or quality of life, then it is not a good thing.

For example. Up to 80% of men have prostate cancer which can now be detected by a simple blood test called PSA. There is a good reason why we are NOT using the simple PSA test in every 80 year old.

Most 80 year old men die WITH prostate cancer rather than DUE to prostate cancer.

So why diagnose a cancer that is not causing symptoms if it is not going to make person live longer !

REFERENCES

Times. New blood test, created by Californian company Grail, detects cancers among over-50s. Kat Lay, Health Editor. Friday June 25 2021, 12.01am, The Times.

Clinical validation of a targeted methylation-based multi-cancer early detection test using an independent validation set. E A Klein et al. Ann Oncol. 2021.

Guardian. Blood test that finds 50 types of cancer is accurate enough to be rolled out.
Diagnostic tool being piloted by NHS England shows ‘impressive results’ in spotting tumours in early stages
Blood tests’ development could help the NHS further.
Nadeem Badshah and agency
Fri 25 Jun 2021 06.00 BST

Daily Mail. NHS trials ‘holy grail’ blood test that can spot 50 kinds of cancer: Ground-breaking check that can accurately detect two thirds of deadly cancers early in healthy people could save thousands of lives a year. By Victoria Allen Science Correspondent For The Daily Mail
00:00, 25 Jun 2021 , updated 10:04, 25 Jun 2021

NHS. Should I have a PSA test?

Disclaimer: Please note- This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is NOT a expert medical opinion on various topics. This blog is purely for information only and do check the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options relevant to you. The views expressed in this blog represent the author’s views held at the time of drafting the blog and may change overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light. The blog is not previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed by any organisation that the author is associated with. The views expressed in this blog are not, in way whatsoever, intended to be a substitute for professional advice.

New treatment for Cervical cancer

Advanced Cervical cancer which has come back after surgery or radiotherpy is usually treated with chemotherapy.

There is a new immunotherapy treatment option for all advanced cervical cancer patients now .

At the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO 2021) virtual conference, an international team of investigators, presented trial data regarding this new immunotherapy drug called cemiplimab.

One group of patients in the trial received the immunotherapy drug cemiplimab every 3 wks and another group of patients received intravenous chemo (pemetrexed, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, irinotecan or topotecan).

Cemiplimab significantly improved survival of patients and was better than chemotherapy.

This new immunotherapy drug cemiplimab is already being used for skin cancers and vulval skin cancers. Very soon, it would be used in cervical cancer patients.

Reference

ESMO 2022 Virtual Plenary Resources:
RANDOMISED PHASE III TRIAL DATA ON THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF CEMIPLIMAB AS OPPOSED TO CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED CERVICAL CANCER. Presenter: Krishnansu S. Tewari, USA; Discussant: Mansoor Mirza, Denmark;

Disclaimer: Please note- This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is NOT a expert medical opinion on various topics. This blog is purely for information only and do check the the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options relevant to you. The views expressed in this blog represent the author’s views held at the time of drafting the blog and may change overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light. The blog is not previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed by any organisation the author is associated with. The views expressed in this blog are not in way intended to be a substitute for professional advice.

Are COVID-19 vaccines safe in cancer patients having immunotherapy?

Yes, Pfizer vaccine is safe.

A recent study published in the esteemed Lancet Oncology Journal shows that the vaccine is well tolerated in patients having immunotherapy.

Unlike cancer chemotherapy, immunotherapy works differently. It works by releasing the in-built brakes holding down the immune system thereby boosting the body’s immune system against cancer.

There has been some theoretical concerns whether this might lead to COVID vaccine causing more side effects.

Reassuringly, the Vaccine side effects were NO different from those seen in people not having immunotherapy. The Vaccine also did NOT increase the immunotherapy side effects.

Immunotherapy is increasingly used widely in treatment of cancer are often better tolerated than chemotherapy.

So the study is good news for tens of thousands of patients on immunotherapy and any cancer patient who has hesitated before, should seriously consider having the vaccine now

COVID infection could be very nasty in cancer patients and all evidence points to the benefits of vaccine far outweighing any risks from the Vaccine.

References

Short-term safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors
The Lancet Oncology. Published: April 1, 2021
Barliz Waissengrin et al. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00155-8

Disclaimer: Please note- This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is NOT a expert medical opinion on various topics. This blog is purely for information only and do check the the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options relevant to you. The views expressed in this blog represent the author’s views held at the time of drafting the blog and may change overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light. The blog is not previewed, commissioned or otherwise endorsed by any organisation the author is associated with. The authors views are not in way intended to be a substitute for professional advice.

Anything potentially good from this COVID-19 pandemic?

It might seem foolish to ask the question “Anything good from this COVID-19 pandemic?” when so many people across the world has been so badly affected by the coronavirus pandemic.

There is some truth in the proverb that “every dark cloud has a silver lining” and no matter how bad the current pandemic is now, human spirit and endeavour would get something positive out of it.

One possible good thing that has come out of the pandemic is the “mRNA technology”.

Of the three vaccines so far, two of them the Pfizer vaccine and the Moderna vaccine are based on RNA technology.

The successful use of RNA technology for Coronavirus Vaccines would hopefully enable the versatile RNA technology to be further developed and successfully used a cancer treatment in near future.

Further clinical trials in cancer patients would be done to provide proof of their potential.

References:

Bloomberg. Technology & Ideas. mRNA Vaccines Could Vanquish Covid Today, Cancer Tomorrow.
The best news about the mRNA shots from BioNTech and Moderna is that the same technique could also defeat many other diseases.

MSKCC. In a Twist, Scientists Find Cancer Drivers Hiding in RNA, Not DNA.

Jerusalem Post Health & Science. Israeli scientists use mRNA COVID-19 vaccine technology to fight cancer. By MAAYAN JAFFE-HOFFMAN NOVEMBER 24, 2020 20:08

Disclaimer: Please note- This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is purely for information only and do check the the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options relevant to you.

The views expressed in this blog represent the author’s views held at the time of drafting the blog and may change overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light. The blog is not necessarily endorsed by any organisation the author is associated with and the authors views are not in way intended to be a substitute for professional advice.

New oral medication approved for Prostate Cancer

Advanced Prostate cancer can be successfully controlled for many years by hormone therapy.

Until now, the hormone therapy, which is widely used widely used, involved either hormone injections or hormone implants.

The FDA in USA has recently approved a new novel oral medication for prostate cancer. It acts quickly and has been proven to be highly active. It is taken as a daily oral medication. It is reasonably well tolerated.

It is not known when the medication would be approved in UK and Europe.

References

(1) NEJM. Oral Relugolix for Androgen-Deprivation Therapy in Advanced Prostate Cancer

(2) FDA approval. FDA approves relugolix for advanced prostate cancer.

(3) Information about Relugolix. FDA: HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION. and FULL PRESCRIBING INFORMATION.

Disclaimer: Please note- This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is purely for information only and do check the the sources where cited. Please DO consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options relevant to you.

The views expressed in this blog represent the author’s views held at the time of drafting the blog and may change overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light. The blog is not necessarily endorsed by any organisation the author is associated with and views are not substitute for professional advice.

Is the COVID-19 Coronavirus vaccine safe for use in patients having chemotherapy and immunotherapy?

Yes, the available indirect evidence indicates that the anticipated benefits overweigh the potential risks.

Cancer patients, particularly those on chemotherapy have compromised immune systems and hence more vulnerable to COVID-19 Coronavirus complications.

The guidelines indicate that anticipated benefits of vaccine are greater than unknown risks from the Coronavirus vaccines.

The Vaccine trials deliberately included lot of healthy people. Very few people with cancer, particularly cancer patients on active treatment, were included in the COVID-19 trials. So there is not much direct evidence regarding efficacy and safety of Vaccines in cancer patients. But indirect evidence significantly favours Coronavirus vaccination in cancer patients.

Flu vaccines are regularly used in cancer patients without any major side effects specific to cancer patients. No increase in incidence or severity of drug side effects were seen in immunotherapy patients having flu vaccines.

On balance, Vaccination is most likely to be of utmost benefit for most advanced cancer patients on active treatment.

References:

ESMO STATEMENTS FOR VACCINATION AGAINST COVID-19 IN PATIENTS WITH CANCER.

Guidance: COVID-19: the green book, chapter 14a
Coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccination information for public health professionals. (UK),

Cochrane: Influenza (flu) vaccination for preventing influenza in adults with cancer

Safety of Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
Curtis R Chong et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2020.

ESMO: CANCER PATIENT MANAGEMENT DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC.

Kuderer NM Choueiri TK Shah DP et al.
Clinical impact of COVID-19 on patients with cancer (CCC19): a cohort study. Lancet. 2020; 395: 1907-1918

Disclaimer: Please note- This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is purely for information only and do check the the sources where cited. Please consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options relevant to you.
The views expressed in this blog represent the author’s views held at the time of drafting the blog and is likely to change overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light. The blog is not necessarily endorsed by any organisation the author is associated with and views are not substitute for professional advice.

Cancer treatment delays during the pandemic

The Staff at National Health Service in UK are doing an admirable job during the pandemic. In the particular, the frontline staff (“patient-facing”) are showing great courage in face of great difficulties and are primarily driven by altruism.

But the pressures of pandemic means many routine scans and hospital clinic appointments have been cancelled particularly during the first wave. There is a great worry about delayed diagnosis of cancer and delayed treatment of cancer.

A paper in BMJ reports that cancer patients survival can be significantly compromised.

But, as with everything else in life, things are not always what they look like at first impression. Even things that are logical and common sense at first glance do not turn out to be simple and clear.

Firstly, delays and cancellations of scans paradoxically could have psychologically benefited some cancer patients . This might seem counterintuitive or even an outrageous statement.

But there are some cancers which are being over diagnosed. A Cancer diagnosis does not always mean a death sentence. Some cancers do not cause problems for a long time or never in the life time of a person. These cancers do not need to be diagnosed promptly. Not being diagnosed with these cancers prevents the psychological burden of a cancer diagnosis. This “over diagnosis” would be expectedly less during pandemic.

Secondly, treatment delays could be caused by a cancer that is advanced and the need for time consuming additional investigations and procedures. Sometimes delays are caused by patients needing to see many medical specialists for the treatment. So it’s the aggressive cancer and the complex patient care that would cause the delay and is responsible for poor outcome rather than the delay by itself.

Read the BMJ article and make your views known.

Mortality due to cancer treatment delay: systematic review and meta-analysis
BMJ 2020; 371 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4087 (Published 04 November 2020)
Cite this as: BMJ 2020;371:m4087

Overdiagnosis in Cancer
H. Gilbert Welch, William C. Black
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Volume 102, Issue 9, 5 May 2010, Pages 605–613, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djq099

Disparities in head and neck cancer: assessing delay in treatment initiation
Urjeet A Patel et al. Laryngoscope. 2012 Aug.

Khorana AA, Tullio K, Elson P, Pennell NA, Grobmyer SR, Kalady MF, et al. (2019) . Time to initial cancer treatment in the United States and association with survival over time: An observational study. PLoS ONE 14(4): e0215108. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215108

New treatment combination for advanced Kidney cancers

The treatment of kidney cancer has dramatically changed in the last decade. More treatments are in pipeline and there was more exciting news this week.

Upfront immunotherapy in combination with other agents is very promising in 1st line treatment of advanced kidney cancers.

Data presented at ESMO ( European Society of Medical Oncology) shows that the combination of Nivolumab and Cabozantinib is better than Sunitinib alone.

“Nivolumab and Cabozantinib” combo joins the other combos “Nivolumab and Ipililumab” and “Pembrolizumab and Axitinib “ as 1st line options

Disclaimer: Please note- This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is purely for information only and do check the the sources where cited. Please consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options relevant to you.

The views expressed in this blog represent the author’s views held at the time of drafting the blog and is likely to change overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light. The blog is not necessarily endorsed by any organisation the author is associated with and views are not substitute for professional advice.

Cancer and COVID-19

Cancer patients, as expected, did badly during the 1st wave of the COVID-19 pandemic

Data presented at ESMO ( European Society of Medical Oncology) shows that Cancers had – higher rates of Hospitalisation, higher risk of Complications and increased risk of Death.

Elderly cancer patients on the whole did very badly but surprisingly cancer patients under age of 50 did far worse than their peers without cancer.

Disclaimer: Please note- This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is purely for information only and do check the the sources where cited. Please consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options relevant to you.

The views expressed in this blog represent the author’s views held at the time of drafting the blog and is likely to change overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light. The blog is not necessarily endorsed by any organisation the author is associated with and views are not substitute for professional advice.

New treatment for Advanced Uterine Cancer

Women with advanced uterine / endometrial cancer are usually treated with chemotherapy.

Those who failed chemotherapy or those who are fit for chemotherapy are sometimes treated with hormone treatment.

Letrozole is one such hormone treatment for those patients with hormone sensitive cancer.

In breast cancer, Letrozole efficacy can be improved by a treatment called Palboclicib.

A trial was done to check whether the same improvement can be observed in uterine cancer when the combination of Letrozole and Palboclicib is tried.

The trial data presented at the ESMO ( European Society of Medical Oncology) is very promising.

If large trials confirm this finding, the combination would be standard treatment in future.

Disclaimer: Please note- This blog is NOT medical advice. This blog is purely for information only and do check the the sources where cited. Please consult your own doctor to discuss concerns and options relevant to you.

The views expressed in this blog represent the author’s views held at the time of drafting the blog and is likely to change overtime, particularly when new evidence comes to light. The blog is not necessarily endorsed by any organisation the author is associated with and views are not substitute for professional advice.