The National Health Service had recently embarked on a Risk assessment exercise of its staff to assess the Vulnerability of individual members to Coronavirus infection ( COVID-19).
The exercise is being done with good intentions. Given the unprecedented situation of the pandemic and lack of concrete data , the exercise seemed to have steered away from firm “one size fits all” type of recommendations.
Given the uncertainties with the currently available data on various forms of protection ( from simple surgical masks to shielding) , the exercise could have been a starting point for an nationwide intervention study .
An opportunity seems to have been missed and if there is a second wave, NHS might regret not learning from the first wave.
Please do add your opinion at the rapid response section of the BMJ.
References
1. Covid-19 risk assessment in BAME staff
Covid-19 risk assessment: a futile metaphorical strip search
BMJ 2020; 370 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3251 (Published 26 August 2020)
Cite this as: BMJ 2020;370:m3251
BMJ 2020; 370 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2743 (Published 15 July 2020)
Cite this as: BMJ 2020;370:m2743
3. Complete protection from covid-19 is possible for health workers
BMJ 2020; 370 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2641 (Published 07 July 2020)
Cite this as: BMJ 2020;370:m2641
4. Two metres or one: what is the evidence for physical distancing in covid-19?
BMJ 2020; 370 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3223 (Published 25 August 2020)
Cite this as: BMJ 2020;370:m3223